The idea that one effect might cause the other is a
joke. Nobody I know – and I’ve asked the
only person I know who has played rugger in the last decade - has a convincing explanation for why the
competition in rugger should be getting tighter. Indeed if that’s what the numbers indicate. So I invite comments, especially from people
who know a hooker from a handsaw.
Monday, 4 February 2013
More equality on the pitch
My first year ICT class delivered product on Friday - a 5
minute talk and a 2 page report - on something that interested each of them
enough to make the effort. I was delighted with the quality of the
presentations and learned a lot. They were on such disparate topics, that I
spent a chunk of the w/e following the intriguing leads they indicated. One lad put together a compendium of records
about the Rugby Six Nations Contest, which is conveniently finite in extent –
2000 was the first year Italy upgraded it from Five Nations. So I was checking up on that, when I came across
a summary of the points scored at each match, for each of the last 13
years . . . and a total for each
year. These data seem to indicate that
the average score in a rugger match is plunging. One of the other mini-projects was about world
population growth (inexorably upwards) so I thought I’d do a mashup of these
two trends. I couldn’t easily find an
annual estimate of world population, but did find (www.cso.ie)
a surrogate in the annual increase in the population of Ireland, which is
conveniently similar in size to the audience/congregation at a rugby match in
Lansdowne Road.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
professionalism?
ReplyDelete